<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lab49.com/archives/727/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/727</link>
	<description>Technology and industry insights from Lab49.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert koppang</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/727/comment-page-1#comment-43924</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert koppang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/?p=727#comment-43924</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person in the world that believes that the purpose of software metrics should be to make it possible to understand software science rather than to predict or determine programmer peformance? If there are others, I would sure like to hear from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person in the world that believes that the purpose of software metrics should be to make it possible to understand software science rather than to predict or determine programmer peformance? If there are others, I would sure like to hear from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

