Comments on: May 2006 Linq Preview Released http://blog.lab49.com/archives/263 Technology and industry insights from Lab49. Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Damien Morton http://blog.lab49.com/archives/263/comment-page-1#comment-1259 Damien Morton Tue, 16 May 2006 14:30:10 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=263#comment-1259 Glad to see that I'm not the only one that visits the portland pattern repository (c2.com). I have to say that my interest in Linq has little to do with DLinq. I will say that all of the Linq code I have seen to date has been free of any threading considerations, but then I havent been looking very hard. You could always post a query on the Linq forums and see what they have to say: http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/showforum.aspx?forumid=123&siteid=1 Glad to see that I’m not the only one that visits the portland pattern repository (c2.com).

I have to say that my interest in Linq has little to do with DLinq. I will say that all of the Linq code I have seen to date has been free of any threading considerations, but then I havent been looking very hard.

You could always post a query on the Linq forums and see what they have to say: http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/showforum.aspx?forumid=123&siteid=1

]]> By: Sergey Lipnevich http://blog.lab49.com/archives/263/comment-page-1#comment-1258 Sergey Lipnevich Tue, 16 May 2006 14:25:24 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=263#comment-1258 I've just read the <a href="http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/2006_04/magazine/features/rjennings/" rel="nofollow">article on January preview of DLinq</a> in <a href="http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/" rel="nofollow">Visual Studio Magazine</a>, and wasn't happy with no mention of scalability issues. The DLinq Overview linked off of <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/ref/linq/" rel="nofollow">The LINQ Project page</a> doesn't speak of threading or caching either. I frequently refer to <a href="http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ObjectRelationalToolComparisonDotNet" rel="nofollow">this laundry list on "the Wiki"</a> to assess ORM tools, and according to it DLinq seems to be doing OK feature-wise. I’ve just read the article on January preview of DLinq in Visual Studio Magazine, and wasn’t happy with no mention of scalability issues. The DLinq Overview linked off of The LINQ Project page doesn’t speak of threading or caching either.

I frequently refer to this laundry list on “the Wiki” to assess ORM tools, and according to it DLinq seems to be doing OK feature-wise.

]]>