Comments on: Fluent Interfaces http://blog.lab49.com/archives/194 Technology and industry insights from Lab49. Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Manung Han http://blog.lab49.com/archives/194/comment-page-1#comment-383 Manung Han Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:36:08 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=194#comment-383 Right, Not exactly new, but something we may need to focus on more. A reply to fluent interfaces by Piers Crawley update on fluent interfaces is here: http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2005/12/21/fluent-interfaces Right,

Not exactly new, but something we may need to focus on more.

A reply to fluent interfaces by Piers Crawley update on fluent interfaces is here:

http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2005/12/21/fluent-interfaces

]]> By: damien morton http://blog.lab49.com/archives/194/comment-page-1#comment-382 damien morton Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:50:04 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=194#comment-382 Im not sure this is entirely new stuff. Peter Norgiv, in his Java IAQ (http://www.norvig.com/java-iaq.html#init2) proposed a similar usage of setters that return a value for class initialization. I first read this IAQ back in 1997 or 1998, so the concept of fluent interfaces certainly isnt new. Im not sure this is entirely new stuff. Peter Norgiv, in his Java IAQ (http://www.norvig.com/java-iaq.html#init2) proposed a similar usage of setters that return a value for class initialization. I first read this IAQ back in 1997 or 1998, so the concept of fluent interfaces certainly isnt new.

]]>