<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not-So-Hidden Latency Part 2 &#8211; Trader/Comprehension Latency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1900/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1900</link>
	<description>Technology and industry insights from Lab49.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivake Gupta</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1900/comment-page-1#comment-106810</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivake Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1900#comment-106810</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not contesting what you&#039;re saying.  There&#039;s a spectrum of opportunities from high return/high touch/low volume to low return/low touch/high volume.  Visualization technologies are a catalyst that helps push things down that spectrum insofar as they help traders to intuit possible analyses of market data.  Yes, those intuitions, once verified and proven, should absolutely be automated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not contesting what you&#8217;re saying.  There&#8217;s a spectrum of opportunities from high return/high touch/low volume to low return/low touch/high volume.  Visualization technologies are a catalyst that helps push things down that spectrum insofar as they help traders to intuit possible analyses of market data.  Yes, those intuitions, once verified and proven, should absolutely be automated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Flemmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1900/comment-page-1#comment-106575</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Flemmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1900#comment-106575</guid>
		<description>I would argue that trading actions that require low latency to be successful are ripe for automation. I think that there is a commiditization cycle that moves trading strategies from high return, high touch, to low return, high volume, with automation as the enabling agent. If the response time of the trader is a competitive advantage, then I would think there is huge payback in automating that response, since the automated response will be orders of magnitude quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that trading actions that require low latency to be successful are ripe for automation. I think that there is a commiditization cycle that moves trading strategies from high return, high touch, to low return, high volume, with automation as the enabling agent. If the response time of the trader is a competitive advantage, then I would think there is huge payback in automating that response, since the automated response will be orders of magnitude quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

