Comments on: A Little Love for /.*?/, Please http://blog.lab49.com/archives/183 Technology and industry insights from Lab49. Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Damien Morton http://blog.lab49.com/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-308 Damien Morton Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:24:45 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=183#comment-308 Dont get me started! Dont get me started!

]]> By: Daniel Chait http://blog.lab49.com/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-255 Daniel Chait Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:23:08 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=183#comment-255 Because this is America! Because this is America!

]]> By: Damien Morton http://blog.lab49.com/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-253 Damien Morton Tue, 06 Dec 2005 05:00:25 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=183#comment-253 Ive always wondered why greedy was the default and non-greedy was an option. Ive always wondered why greedy was the default and non-greedy was an option.

]]> By: Ken Overton http://blog.lab49.com/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-252 Ken Overton Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:09:07 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=183#comment-252 As I understand it, adding '$' would enforce greediness rather than turn it off. What I can't figure out is what '.*?$' would mean. I think it would force the non-greedy expression to be interpretted in a greedy fashion. As I understand it, adding ‘$’ would enforce greediness rather than turn it off. What I can’t figure out is what ‘.*?$’ would mean. I think it would force the non-greedy expression to be interpretted in a greedy fashion.

]]> By: Doug Finke http://blog.lab49.com/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-251 Doug Finke Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:00:44 +0000 http://blog.lab49.com/?p=183#comment-251 Ken Does anchoring a pattern "turn off" the greediness? "^>.*$" Ken

Does anchoring a pattern “turn off” the greediness?

“^>.*$”

]]>