<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Control.Invoke Gotcha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lab49.com/archives/154/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/154</link>
	<description>Technology and industry insights from Lab49.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Chait</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/154/comment-page-1#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Chait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/?p=154#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Fancy!  I also saw in the docs you pointed to:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A call to an EventHandler or MethodInvoker delegate will be faster than a call to another type of delegate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmm.  Seems like for any other delegate type they will do a DynamicInvoke but that they&#039;ve optimized here for these two &quot;special&quot; delegate types.  WinForms performance mavens, take heed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fancy!  I also saw in the docs you pointed to:</p>
<blockquote><p>A call to an EventHandler or MethodInvoker delegate will be faster than a call to another type of delegate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm.  Seems like for any other delegate type they will do a DynamicInvoke but that they&#8217;ve optimized here for these two &#8220;special&#8221; delegate types.  WinForms performance mavens, take heed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

