<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tag lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1438/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1438</link>
	<description>Technology and industry insights from Lab49.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smangano</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1438/comment-page-1#comment-90266</link>
		<dc:creator>smangano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1438#comment-90266</guid>
		<description>Although I agree with the poor choice of Plan B, Brother Printers are excellent. My MFC 8860 DN is the best printer I ever owed, for the money (and I&#039;ve had a few HP&#039;s). For me, its Plan B!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with the poor choice of Plan B, Brother Printers are excellent. My MFC 8860 DN is the best printer I ever owed, for the money (and I&#8217;ve had a few HP&#8217;s). For me, its Plan B!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1438/comment-page-1#comment-89416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1438#comment-89416</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;Scalable Innovation&quot;? Because after you show someone something cool (innovative) the first question they have (if they have been round the block) is: &quot;yeah, but will it scale?&quot;

On demand is good because it highlights our availability and ability; but scalable highlights the quality of the end product we deliver. In terms of software quality, wider team efficiency and project progress visibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;Scalable Innovation&#8221;? Because after you show someone something cool (innovative) the first question they have (if they have been round the block) is: &#8220;yeah, but will it scale?&#8221;</p>
<p>On demand is good because it highlights our availability and ability; but scalable highlights the quality of the end product we deliver. In terms of software quality, wider team efficiency and project progress visibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

