<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delta, Lambda, Pi (the fraternity of calculi)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1187/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1187</link>
	<description>Technology and industry insights from Lab49.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-74181</link>
		<dc:creator>Choy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 03:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/?p=1187#comment-74181</guid>
		<description>great papers. the second one was an easier read. but the last one was way too long to print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great papers. the second one was an easier read. but the last one was way too long to print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalani Thielen</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-68095</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalani Thielen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/?p=1187#comment-68095</guid>
		<description>Doug, it&#039;s just another way of saying DSL (maybe with more emphasis on the D than the L).

Sal, good point -- it can be very easy to implement a compiler/interpreter for a new language, but a very complex and difficult decision for a business to seriously invest in it.  If there&#039;s money on the line it had better have indexes. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, it&#8217;s just another way of saying DSL (maybe with more emphasis on the D than the L).</p>
<p>Sal, good point &#8212; it can be very easy to implement a compiler/interpreter for a new language, but a very complex and difficult decision for a business to seriously invest in it.  If there&#8217;s money on the line it had better have indexes. <img src='http://blog.lab49.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smangano</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-68088</link>
		<dc:creator>smangano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/?p=1187#comment-68088</guid>
		<description>I think that any company that can create a programming language that embodies the very essence of their business has created a huge competitive advantage for themselves. Of course this is very hard to do and does have some downside risk. Erlang comes very close to this ideal for the telecom industry although it clearly errs on the side of being a general programming language. Such efforts should be rewarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that any company that can create a programming language that embodies the very essence of their business has created a huge competitive advantage for themselves. Of course this is very hard to do and does have some downside risk. Erlang comes very close to this ideal for the telecom industry although it clearly errs on the side of being a general programming language. Such efforts should be rewarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blog.lab49.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-68074</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lab49.com/?p=1187#comment-68074</guid>
		<description>Niche Programming Languages? Is that another way of saying DSL (Domain Specific Language)? Or do you see DSLs as something completely different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niche Programming Languages? Is that another way of saying DSL (Domain Specific Language)? Or do you see DSLs as something completely different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

